WERE WE TOO HARD ON “GLITTER”?
“Mostly dross, an unintentionally hilarious compendium of time-tested cinematic clichés that illustrates the chasm between hopeful imitation and successful duplication,” wrote The New York Times.
“It’s doubtful that even a real actress could have triumphed over the rusty tinsel of Glitter, a hapless, retro-’80s Star Is Born,” wrote Entertainment Weekly.
That was the temperature around Glitter in 2001. For a quarter century, you haven’t really needed to see Mariah Carey’s star vehicle to know what you’re supposed to think about it. Glitter was a flop. Glitter was a disaster. Glitter was the movie equivalent of walking into a glass door.
Watching it 25 years later, though, there’s something almost funny about the size of that reputation compared to the movie we actually get. Glitter is glossy, earnest, extremely silly, and occasionally so committed to its own melodrama that you just have to respect the nerve. Above all, it’s much stranger and a bit more fun than the cultural memory of it would suggest.
So how did a sparkly little rise-to-fame romance starring one of the biggest singers in the world become synonymous with cinematic catastrophe? That story’s almost more dramatic than the movie.
I had no idea you could blow like that.
For anyone who’s never seen Glitter or doesn’t remember the discourse around it, take a walk down memory lane with me.
Once upon a time in a ghetto far, far away, a young mixed-race girl named Billie Frank looks up to her alcohol-addicted mother (Valarie Pettiford, channeling Whitney Houston), a struggling nightclub singer trying her best to keep the two of them afloat. One house fire later, Billie’s separated from her mother and sent to foster care. It’s a lot of childhood trauma to dispense within the opening minutes, but Glitter has places to be.
Jump to 1983: adult Billie, played by Carey, is dancing in clubs with her best friends Louise and Roxanne (Da Brat and Tia Texada, respectively). They’re hired as backup singers for a pop star named Sylk, except Sylk can’t really sing. Billie does the vocals. Sylk gets the face time.
Enter Julian “Dice” Black (Max Beesley), a hotshot club DJ who hears Billie’s real voice and recognizes the talent. He wants to produce her. Unfortunately, there’s a contract in the way, so Dice agrees to pay shady promoter Timothy Walker (Terrence Howard) $100,000 for Billie’s release.
I need you to hold onto this $100,000, because Glitter certainly does.
Billie and Dice make music, fall in love, and launch her career at roughly the speed it takes most of us to finish an iced coffee. She gets a record deal. “Loverboy” becomes a hit. She performs at a major awards show. Fame arrives via same-day delivery.
The main conflict’s supposed to be the strain success puts on Billie and Dice’s relationship, but Glitter has several other storylines it’s determined to squeeze in. Billie’s searching for her mother. Dice is jealous. The label doesn’t want him producing her album. Her friends worry about the relationship. And remember Timothy and that $100,000?
Eventually Billie and Dice split, Billie becomes even more famous, and the film enters a final act so wildly overstuffed it feels like someone explaining a soap opera while the soap opera’s still happening. Billie and Dice separately write the same song, because soulmates. Dice decides to reconcile with her. Then Timothy shoots him over the unpaid debt. Billie learns he’s been killed just before performing at Madison Square Garden, sings “Never Too Far” in his memory, and then discovers Dice has also located her long-lost mother.
She goes to see her in a limo, still wearing wearing the glitzy sequined gown from her Dice-dedicated performance. They hug. They cry. Roll credits.
You almost have to admire the efficiency.
Don’t believe everything you hear.
Before we get to the pile-on, it’s worth remembering exactly who Mariah Carey was in 2001. She was Mariah Carey, already one of the defining pop stars of her generation. Her self-titled debut had made her an immediate force in 1990, and she spent the next decade stacking No. 1s, selling an absurd number of records, and establishing the kind of vocal range only a super-intelligent, super-human, hyper-species could comprehend.
By 2001, she had the kind of industry leverage very few artists ever get. Virgin signed her to a four-album deal reportedly worth around $80 million. Glitter was supposed to kick off that new era. Instead, its soundtrack became the weakest-selling album of Carey’s career up to that point. And after more than a decade of making astronomical success look almost routine, Mariah Carey had finally stumbled. And everybody was watching.
The Glitter soundtrack was released on September 11, probably the worst release date in American history. The movie arrived ten days later. From there, its disappointing box office and brutal reviews quickly calcified into something bigger than an unsuccessful movie. Glitter became shorthand for disaster.
Critics, as you may have gathered, weren’t charmed by it. The movie currently sits at 6 percent on Rotten Tomatoes and a 14 on Metacritic, where 87 percent of the collected reviews are classified as negative. By the end of 2001, The Washington Post had included it on its ten worst movies of the year list, calling it a “howler of a vanity show.” The Razzies nominated it for six awards, with Carey winning Worst Actress.
Glitter spent the next two decades becoming a fixture of worst-movie lists, turning up in roundups from Empire and Vanity Fair. As movie criticism moved online, the joke followed it there. YouTube list-makers kept finding new categories to put it in: worst movies of all time, worst movies of the 2000s, worst movie of 2001, worst movies of the century so far.
That reputation has followed it much longer than its actual 104-minute runtime ever could. Don’t get me wrong, the movie deserved criticism. It’s weirdly paced, the ending is ridiculous, and the whole thing is cheesy beyond all reasonable measure. Major emotional turns happen at warp speed. But being bad doesn’t fully explain how Glitter became a punchline.
Remember the name, Billie Frank.
Romance, melodrama, fashion, pop stardom—the things that signal a female audience—have historically been used as shorthand for lesser art. Movies made with women in mind are often treated as culturally unserious before anyone even gets to see whether they work. Glitter didn’t create that bias, but it arrived with one of the most famous women in the world at the center of it.
So much of the mockery around Glitter got pinned directly on Carey. But the movie’s real problem isn’t that Mariah Carey fails to disappear into Billie Frank. It’s that Billie Frank barely exists. She gets a traumatic childhood, extraordinary talent, a missing mother, instant fame, romantic conflict, and grief, yet almost no interior life connecting one event to the next.
For most of Glitter, Billie’s career is something other people arrange around her. Dice discovers her. The label signs her. Handlers style her. Executives book her. Billie mostly moves from one milestone to the next looking vaguely surprised to have arrived. Cheryl L. West’s story and Kate Lanier’s script give Carey precious little to play beyond talented, beautiful, and increasingly famous. And Carey doesn’t exactly crack the code either. There are scenes where Billie should be furious, devastated, in love, or completely overwhelmed, and Carey often lands somewhere closer to politely concerned.
But freed from the expectation that it had to justify Carey’s jump to the big screen, Glitter can actually just be appreciated for what it is: a campy time capsule with a great soundtrack, fabulous clothes, and absolutely no understanding of how contracts work.
Glitter is also gloriously, helplessly earnest. When Billie and Dice discover they independently wrote the same song, the movie presents this information with the solemnity of DNA evidence. When Billie later leaves a lipstick kiss on Dice’s sheet music, love has apparently left a physical receipt.
Modern camp is often too self-aware; it arrives pre-captioned, already anticipating the meme. Glitter simply believes—in rags-to-riches, in true love, in a DJ’s ability to turn a backup singer into Madison Square Garden material in what feels like a long weekend.
And while the film’s plot may be patchy, and some characters are majorly underdeveloped, the movie’s glitzy costumes, brought to life by costume designer Joseph G. Aulisi, are a bona fide masterpiece. The skimpy minidresses and tight slips are basically the perfect time capsule of trashy 2000s clubwear.
When we meet Billie as an adult, she's dancing in a nightclub wearing nothing but a leopard-trimmed bustier (the wind blowing in her hair just right—a Carey signature). Her costumes—and there are a lot of them!—only get better from there. As Billie begins making it big, we see her wearing an asymmetrical top and ruffled miniskirt and, later, a tight sweetheart-neckline minidress with pink sheer gloves.
And these over-the-top 2000s style hits don’t end with Carey; the supporting characters have stellar fashion looks, too. Silk, a famous singer who can’t actually sing, played by Padma Lakshmi, often steals the show in her feather-trimmed catsuits, sparkly onesies, and chain belts. The title, apparently, is legally binding.
The only (and biggest) issue is that it never quite feels like the actual early ’80s. It feels like Y2K pop culture putting on an ’80s costume.
Even the music business is preserved in amber. Club DJs are kingmakers. Record executives sit behind enormous desks. A music-video shoot is a major career event. Watching Glitter now means watching two eras at once: the decade it’s trying to recreate and the very specific early-2000s moment doing the recreating.
Woe is me?’ What the hell is that?
Over time, fans have started reclaiming at least part of the Glitter era. In 2018, the #JusticeForGlitter campaign helped send the soundtrack back up the iTunes charts, introducing a whole new generation to an album that’d spent years being treated like collateral damage from the movie. Carey herself has since been much more willing to joke about and embrace the project.
The movie may never get the same rehabilitation as the music, but the instinct behind the reconsideration makes sense to me.
So: were we too hard on Glitter?
On the movie? A little. On Mariah? Absolutely.
Glitter isn’t good. But “not good” covers an enormous and sometimes delightful range of human achievement. It’s too glossy to be truely aggravating, too musically committed to be boring, and far too ridiculous to deserve the grim reputation it’s carried.
The strangest thing about rewatching Glitter now is realizing that the movie everyone remembers as a catastrophe is actually kind of an ok time. Mostly, you finish it wondering what all the fuss was about.
Cause baby, this was never that serious.
Comments